Miracle at 48th Street?
Jan. 16th, 2009 07:22 amWhilst listening to Bomb Shelter Radio last night, Fuzz was talking about the off-airport landing of the USAir flight from LaGuardia. I'm pretty sure I heard him say something like "it's a miracle". I'm not sure if he was speaking for himself or quoting someone... whatever.
The first thing that leapt to mind was "If it's a miracle, Colour Sergeant, it's a Boxer Henry short point 45 caliber miracle", spoken by Lieutenant Chard to Colour Sergeant Bourne at the conclusion of the remarkable stand by B Company, 24th Foot, at Rourke's Drift in which a company stood off three battalions or so of Zulus over a day and a night. Great story.
It is clear from the outcome on the Hudson that the drivers didn't stop flying that airplane until it had come to a complete stop, then saw to the orderly disembarkation of the passengers in their care. It is a remarkable outcome, but we are not at a loss for an explanation of how it came to pass, thus not meeting the requirements for miraculosity.
Ah, well...
Update: The article in the Washington Post was laudably free from hyperbole. It did claim that the birds in question were geese -- somewhat larger than most birds. It did say "Safety experts expressed surprise that a commercial jet with modern engines could be brought down by a flock of birds." Some experts...
The first thing that leapt to mind was "If it's a miracle, Colour Sergeant, it's a Boxer Henry short point 45 caliber miracle", spoken by Lieutenant Chard to Colour Sergeant Bourne at the conclusion of the remarkable stand by B Company, 24th Foot, at Rourke's Drift in which a company stood off three battalions or so of Zulus over a day and a night. Great story.
It is clear from the outcome on the Hudson that the drivers didn't stop flying that airplane until it had come to a complete stop, then saw to the orderly disembarkation of the passengers in their care. It is a remarkable outcome, but we are not at a loss for an explanation of how it came to pass, thus not meeting the requirements for miraculosity.
Ah, well...
Update: The article in the Washington Post was laudably free from hyperbole. It did claim that the birds in question were geese -- somewhat larger than most birds. It did say "Safety experts expressed surprise that a commercial jet with modern engines could be brought down by a flock of birds." Some experts...
no subject
Date: 2009-01-16 12:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-16 12:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-16 12:47 pm (UTC)That all these things happened is a testament to the engineering involved but its still pretty darn lucky.
(Reply to this)
no subject
Date: 2009-01-16 01:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-16 02:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-16 02:36 pm (UTC)Lieutenant John Chard: If it's a miracle, Colour Sergeant, it's a short chamber Boxer Henry point 45 caliber miracle.
Colour Sergeant Bourne: And a bayonet, sir, with some guts behind.
Wonderful movie. I should watch it (again) tonight.
I think the miraculous part of the whole plane landing thing is that nothing went wrong: The pilot made a perfect landing under very difficult conditions; the emergency chutes and flotation devices deployed properly; none of the passengers panicked wildly (so they were able to get everyone out in a swift and orderly fashion; there were ferry boats on hand; the emergency responders were there very quickly; and so on.
It's hard to coordinate all that sort of stuff when you're trying to do it with plenty of time. To do it on an ad-hoc emergency basis and have it all go right is at least unusual, if not downright miraculous.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-16 02:40 pm (UTC)To start with the engines are over 80m apart which means the flock has to be very large, also airports spend a lot of money detecting and dispersing flocks of birds from the paths of airliners.
So yes bird strike is a common enough event but this incident is an exceptional event and that is what is surpising to those of us who work in this field.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-16 03:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-16 03:25 pm (UTC)80m seems more like the wingspan of an A320, not the engine spacing. I might buy 80 feet...
All the same, yes it was exceptional, but to be surprised that it could happen at all suggests unwarranted optimism.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-16 04:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-16 07:31 pm (UTC)However, I said "miracle" because I felt some things were beyond the technical. The investigation may prove me wrong on this, but consider the following:
1) At least one engine exploded (according to a passenger), and yet there wasn't enough flight surface (wing) damage to prevent a reasonable landing.
2) The Hudson River is (as one newsman put it) a beehive of activity on the water and as a low-level air corridor. Not to mention a certain large bridge that was missed. Nothing got hit during the landing.
3) The plane comes to rest in the water near a ferry terminal.
4) The plane managed to cross over one of the densest population centers of the United States and not crash.
So, yes... a technical and training accomplishment. But I think there were elements of luck, or a miracle, or what have you going on as well.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-16 07:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-16 07:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-16 07:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-16 07:55 pm (UTC)Personally, I have a sneaking suspicion that the whole thing was an Act Of God carefully staged by Deity/Deities to cheer New Yorkers up. (There were a series of really fortuitous positive circumstances... like settling RIGHT by the ferry terminal, which the pilot couldn't have been aiming for...)